|
info@DangerousClimateChange.com
|
Dangerous
Climate Change
www.DangerousClimateChange.com
What
is Dangerous Climate
Change?
Dangerous Climate Change has been widely accepted by a number of scientists, climatologists, NGO's and governments that concluded Dangerous Climate Change will occur if we do not reverse the amount of greenhouse gas emissions being spewed into the atmosphere, primarily from the use and burning of fossil fuels. Dr. James Hansen states that "recent analyses indicate that the amount of atmospheric CO2 required to cause Dangerous Climate Change is at most 450 ppm, and likely less than that. Reductions of non-CO2 climate forcings can provide only moderate, albeit important, adjustments to the CO2 limit. Realization of how close the planet is to ‘tipping points’ with unacceptable consequences, especially ice sheet disintegration with sea level rise out of humanity’s control, has a bright side. It implies an imperative: we must find a way to keep the CO2 amount so low that it will also avert other detrimental effects that had begun to seem inevitable, e.g., ocean acidification, loss of most alpine glaciers and thus the water supply for millions of people, and shifting of climatic zones with consequent extermination of species.
Dangerous Climate Change was discussed at the Scientific Symposium on Stabilization of Greenhouse Gases in 2005 wherein they examined the link between concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions, and the 2 °C (3.6 °F) ceiling on global warming thought necessary to avoid the most serious effects of global warming. Previously this had generally been accepted as being 550 ppm of carbon dioxide emissions.
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC ) international environmental treaty (1992) states as its objective: "the ultimate objective of this Convention and any related legal instruments that the Conference of the Parties may adopt is to achieve, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Convention, stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent Dangerous Climate Change with the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time-frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner."
International and national policies have established greenhouse gas emissions, specifically those of carbon dioxide emissions, to be limited to 350 ppm. At present, carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere are approaching 390 ppm, which will not prevent Dangerous Climate Change. We also see research, papers and statements from scientists and others that “dangerous” climate change is already happening.
Many scientists have already concluded that the “scientific evidence is compelling” that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions – as opposed to natural forces – are causing Dangerous Climate Change. The EPA has relied on what it calls “three lines of evidence.” The first is based on the “physical” understanding of the climate. The second is the determination that the temperatures of the last “several decades” are unusual and even unprecedented during the current interglacial period known as the Holocene, when the world’s climate system has been similar to that of today, and particularly during the last 1000-2000 years when more is known about climate. The third is based on computer model simulations.
_______________________________________________________
Our "Integrated" CHP
Systems (Cogeneration
and Trigeneration)
Plants
Have Very High Efficiencies, Low Fuel Costs & Low Emissions
The Effective Heat Rate is Approximately
4100 btu/kW & System Efficiency is 92% Plant.
The CHP System
below is Rated at 900 kW and Features:
(2) Natural Gas Engines @ 450 kW each on one Skid with Optional
Selective Catalytic Reduction system that removes Nitrogen
Oxides to "non-detect."



Our CHP Systems may be the best solution for your company's economic and environmental sustainability as we "upgrade" natural gas to clean power with our clean power generation solutions.
Our Emissions
Abatement solutions reduce Nitrogen
Oxides to "non-detect" which means our Trigeneration
energy systems can be installed and
operated in most EPA non-attainment regions!
_______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
energy
system, through a Power
Purchase Agreement that guarantees
a minimum 10% reduction in our client's energy expenses.
(NOTE: Engineering and related interim project development
expenses may be at client's expense but will be
refunded at the close of Power
Purchase Agreement or other project financing. Some of our
engineering
and EPC services may be provided by one of our Top-ranked ENR Engineering/EPC
partner companies.)
To receive a preliminary no-obligation review of your energy, engineering or
project plans,
send an introductory email to us at the following email address:
______________________________________________________
The
Business Model of "Central
Power Plants" is a failed model due to the
following failures of Central
Power Plants and the companies that own or operate them:
Highly inefficient
Highly polluting - generating hazardous air pollutants, mercury and greenhouse gas emissions, all of which are now regulated, and are now, or will be heavily taxed.
Consume inordinate amounts of fuel.
Waste inordinate amounts of useful heat energy.
Require as many as 5-10 years to begin construction of new central power plants
Typically owned by highly inefficient, heavily regulated electric utility companies that are massive bureaucracies requiring significant amounts of capital that are passed on to customers
Located as far as 50 miles, to 150 miles from the load center, or market
The new, replacement Business Model to
Central Power
Plants is "Dispersed Generation."
Dispersed Generation
power and energy systems with CHP Systems are, in general;
At approximately 90% system efficiency, CHP Systems about 250% more efficient than Central Power Plants.
Highly efficient
Generate 50% to 100% fewer emissions
Consume 50% to 90% less fuel
Located at the load center, i.e. customer's location, where the "waste heat" energy can be recovered and used by the client.
Can be permitted and built in less than 12-18 months
NOTE: The above can be affected by a number of variables can affect the above. We can provide the turnkey solution and installation for clients in the 500 kW to 10 MW range. Our front-end engineering design and economic analysis determines the optimum solution for our clients, that takes into account the client's location, operation/business and how the client uses power and energy and their existing electric and natural gas rates. All of which play an important role regarding the client's return on investment.
Our new company will be the leading provider of CHP Systems for the Dispersed Generation market within 5 years.
______________________________________________________
What is "Cogeneration"?
Did you know that 10% of our nation's electricity now comes from "cogeneration" plants?
And
because cogeneration
is so efficient, it saves its customers up to 40% on their energy expenses, and
provides even greater savings to our environment through significant reductions
in fuel usage and much lower greenhouse
gas emissions.
Cogeneration
- also known as “combined
heat and power” (CHP), cogen, district energy, total energy, and
combined cycle, is the simultaneous production of heat (usually in the form of
hot water and/or steam) and power, utilizing one primary fuel such as natural
gas, or a renewable fuel, such as Biomethane,
B100 Biodiesel,
or Synthesis Gas.
Cogeneration technology is not the latest industry buzz-word being touted as the solution to our nation's energy woes. Cogeneration is a proven technology that has been around for over 120 years!
Our nation's first commercial power plant was a cogeneration plant that was designed and built by Thomas Edison in 1882 in New York. Our nation's first commercial power plant was called the "Pearl Street Station."
______________________________________________________
What is "Trigeneration"?
Trigeneration is the simultaneous production of three forms of energy - typically, Cooling, Heating and Power - from only one fuel input. Put another way, our trigeneration power plants produce three different types of energy for the price of one.
Trigeneration energy systems can reach overall system efficiencies of 86% to 93%. Typical "central" power plants, that do not need the heat generated from the combustion and power generation process, are only about 33% efficient.

Trigeneration
Diagram & Description
Trigeneration Power Plants' Have the Highest System Efficiencies and are
About 300 % More Efficient than Typical Central Power Plants
Trigeneration
plants are installed at locations that can benefit from all three forms of
energy. These types of installations that install trigeneration
energy systems are called "onsite power generation" also referred to as
"decentralized energy."
One of our company's principal's first experience with the design and development of a trigeneration power plant was the trigeneration power plant installation at Rice University in 1987 where our trigeneration development team started out by conducting a "cogeneration" feasibility study. The EPC contractor that Rice University selected installed the trigeneration power which included a 4.0 MW Ruston gas turbine power plant, along with waste heat recovery boilers and Absorption Chillers. A "waste heat recovery boiler" captures the heat from the exhaust of the gas turbine. From there, the recovered energy was converted to chilled water - originally from (3) Hitachi Absorption Chillers - 2 were rated at 1,000 tons each, and the third Hitachi Absorption Chiller was rated at 1,500 tons. The Hitachi Absorption Chillers were replaced shortly after their installation by the EPC company. The first trigeneration plant at Rice University was so successful, they added a second 5.0 MW trigeneration plant so today, Rice University is now generating about 9.0 MW of electricity, and also producing the cooling and heating the university needs from the trigeneration plant and circulating the trigeneration energy around its campus.

Trigeneration Chart
Trigeneration's
"Super-Efficiency" compared
with other competing technologies
As you can see, there is No Competition for Trigeneration!
Our trigeneration power plants are the ideal onsite power
and energy solution for customers that include: Data
Centers, Hospitals, Universities, Airports, Central Plants, Colleges
& Universities, Dairies, Server Farms, District Heating & Cooling
Plants,
Food Processing Plants, Golf/Country
Clubs, Government Buildings, Grocery Stores, Hotels, Manufacturing
Plants,
Nursing Homes, Office
Buildings / Campuses,
Radio Stations, Refrigerated
Warehouses,
Resorts,
Restaurants,
Schools, Server Farms, Shopping Centers, Supermarkets, Television
Stations, Theatres and Military Bases.
At about 86% to 93% net system efficiency, our trigeneration power plants are about 300% more efficient at providing energy than your current electric utility. That's because the typical electric utility's power plants are only about 33% efficient - they waste 2/3 of the fuel in generating electricity in the enormous amount of waste heat energy that they exhaust through their smokestacks.
Trigeneration is defined as the simultaneous production of three energies: Cooling, Heating and Power. Our trigeneration energy systems use the same amount of fuel in producing three energies that would normally only produce just one type of energy. This means our customers that have our trigeneration power plants have significantly lower energy expenses, and a lower carbon footprint.
Waste
Heat Recovery in Cogeneration
and
Trigeneration power and energy
systems
In most cogeneration and trigeneration power and energy systems, the exhaust gas from the electric generation equipment is ducted to a heat exchanger to recover the thermal energy in the gas. These heat exchangers are air-to-water heat exchangers, where the exhaust gas flows over some form of tube and fin heat exchange surface and the heat from the exhaust gas is transferred to make hot water or steam. The hot water or steam is then used to provide hot water or steam heating and/or to operate thermally activated equipment, such as an absorption chiller for cooling or a desiccant dehumidifer for dehumidification.
Many of the waste heat recovery technologies used in building co/trigeneration systems require hot water, some at moderate pressures of 15 to 150 psig. In the cases where additional steam or pressurized hot water is needed, it may be necessary to provide supplemental heat to the exhaust gas with a duct burner.
In some applications air-to-air heat exchangers can be used. In other instances, if the emissions from the generation equipment are low enough, such as is with many of the microturbine technologies, the hot exhaust gases can be mixed with make-up air and vented directly into the heating system for building heating.
In the majority of installations, a flapper damper or "diverter" is employed to vary flow across the heat transfer surfaces of the heat exchanger to maintain a specific design temperature of the hot water or steam generation rate.
Typical
Waste Heat Recovery Installation

In some cogeneration and
trigeneration
designs, the exhaust gases can be used to activate a
thermal wheel or a desiccant dehumidifier. Thermal wheels use the exhaust gas
to heat a wheel with a medium that absorbs the heat and then transfers the
heat when the wheel is rotated into the incoming airflow.
A professional engineer should be involved in designing and sizing of the Waste Heat Recovery section. For a proper and economical operation, the design of the heat recovery section involves consideration of many related factors, such as the thermal capacity of the exhaust gases, the exhaust flow rate, the sizing and type of heat exchanger, and the desired parameters over a various range of operating conditions of the cogeneration or trigeneration system — all of which need to be considered for proper and economical operation.
The
Market and Potential for Waste Heat
Recovery technologies and solutions
There are more than 500,000 smokestacks in the U.S. that are "wasting" heat, an untapped resource that can be converted to energy with Waste Heat Recovery technologies.
About 10% of these 500,000 smokestacks represent about 75% of the available wasted heat which has a stack gas exit temperature above 500 degrees F. which could generate approximately 50,000 megawatts of electricity annually and an annual market of over $75 billion in gross revenues before tax incentives and greenhouse gas emissions credits.
Waste Heat Recovery technologies represent the least cost solution which provides the greatest return on investment, than any other possible green energy technology or "carbon free energy" opportunity!
_______________________________________________________
August
12, 2010
WASHINGTON, D.C.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing two rules to
ensure that businesses planning to build new, large facilities or make major
expansions to existing ones will be able to obtain Clean Air Act permits that
address their greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions. In the spring of 2010, EPA finalized the Greenhouse
Gas Emissions "Tailoring Rule"
which specifies that beginning in 2011, projects that will increase greenhouse
gas emissions substantially will require an air permit. The Greenhouse
Gas Emissions Tailoring Rule will
help ensure that these sources will be able to get those permits regardless of
where they are located.
The Greenhouse Gas Reporting
"Tailoring Rule" covers large industrial facilities like power plants and oil
refineries that are responsible for 70 percent of the greenhouse
gas emissions from stationary sources. The proposals announced today are a
critical component for implementing the GHG
Emissions Tailoring Rule and would ensure that greenhouse
gas emissions from these large facilities are minimized in all 50 states and
that local economies can continue to grow.
The Clean Air Act requires states to develop EPA-approved implementation plans
that include requirements for issuing air permits. When federal permitting
requirements change, as they did after EPA finalized the GHG
Emissions Tailoring Rule that requires all 50 states to update or modify
these plans.
In the first rule, EPA is proposing to require permitting programs in 13 states
to make changes to their implementation plans to ensure that GHG emissions will
be covered. All other states that implement an EPA-approved air permitting
program must review their existing permitting authority and inform EPA if their
programs do not address greenhouse
gas emissions.
Because some states may not be able to develop and submit revisions to their
plans before the Tailoring Rule becomes effective in 2011, in the second rule,
EPA is proposing a federal implementation plan, which would allow EPA to issue
permits for large GHG emitters located in these states. This would be a
temporary measure that is in place until the state can revise its own plan and
resume responsibility for greenhouse
gas emissions permitting.
States are best-suited to issue permits to sources of greenhouse
gas emissions and have long-standing experience working together with
industrial facilities. EPA will work closely and promptly with states to help
them develop, submit, and approve necessary revisions to enable the affected
states to issue air permits to GHG-emitting sources. Additionally, EPA will
continue to provide guidance and act as a resource for the states as they make
the various required permitting decisions for greenhouse
gas emissions.
The
EPA will accept comment on the first proposal for updated state implementation
plans for 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. EPA has scheduled a
hearing on the second proposal for the federal implementation plan on August 25,
2010, and will accept comment for 30 days after that hearing. The agency is
working to finalize these rules prior to January 2, 2011, the earliest greenhouse
gas emissions permitting requirements will be effective.
What are Greenhouse Gas
Emissions?
Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
are those
greenhouse gases that allow sunlight to enter the atmosphere freely and
contribute to the greenhouse effect, which many believe is the cause of global
warming. There are natural and man-made greenhouse gas emissions. The
primary greenhouse gases thought to be major contributors to global warming
are; carbon dioxide emissions
(CO2), methane & biomethane emissions (CH 4),
chlorofluorocarbons, and nitrogen
oxides (N2O).
The primary sources of
greenhouse gas emissions from manmade sources include; fossil-fueled power plants such as
natural gas power plants and coal fired power plants. Other sources of
greenhouse gas emissions linked to manmade causes include internal
combustion engines (fueled by gasoline and petroleum diesel) and
deforestation.
Many people don't realize that as much as
25% of per cent of the carbon dioxide emissions are naturally absorbed
by the ocean and another 25% of the carbon dioxide emissions are absorbed by
our biosphere, such as trees, plants, soil, etc. This leaves about 50%
of the carbon dioxide emissions that are not absorbed and remaining in our
atmosphere. As previously stated, carbon dioxide emissions are linked
primarily to the burning of fossil fuels (power plants, cars, trucks, etc.)
and deforestation.
Greenhouse gas emissions have been on the increase ever since the dawn of the industrial revolution.
What is the "Greenhouse Effect" and the "Natural Greenhouse
Effect?"
The
"Natural Greenhouse Effect" is the natural level of greenhouse gases
that are in the Earth's atmosphere. This keeps our planet
warmer than it would otherwise be, and essential for life. Water
vapor is the most important component of the natural greenhouse effect.
Approximately 80% to 90% of our planet's natural greenhouse effect is due to water
vapor
which is a very strong and potent greenhouse gas. The remaining 10% to 20% of the Earth's natural greenhouse effect is due to
carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane plus a few relatively minor greenhouse gases.
The "Greenhouse Effect" the Earth is experiencing is due to the anthropogenic, or man-made greenhouse gas emissions that are polluting the Earth's atmosphere and ecosystem. The Greenhouse Effect enhances or exacerbates the Earth's "natural greenhouse effect" with the additional greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of fossil fuels that come from coal, natural gas and other petroleum/hydrocarbon fuels.
The greenhouse effect is driven via "infrared radiation." Greenhouse gases trap some of the infrared radiation that escapes from the Earth which makes/keeps the Earth warmer than it would otherwise be. Greenhouse gases act as a "blanket" for this infrared radiation and keeps the Earth's lower layers of the atmosphere warmer, and the upper layers cooler, than it would otherwise be is the greenhouse gases were not there.
It is the additional greenhouse gas emissions (primarily carbon dioxide emissions) and their ever-increasing levels in the atmosphere - due to the burning of fossil fuels - that are the cause of climate change and global warming. The anthropogenic or man-made portion of the greenhouse effect, which started with the industrial revolution 150 years ago with the growing use of fossil fuels, that is the basis of the greenhouse effect.
One of the many negative outcomes to the planet is the acidification of the Earth's oceans.
What is Ocean Acidification?
Ocean acidification is the changing of the planet's oceans pH levels from alkaline to acid. The oceans absorb about 25% of the carbon dioxide emissions from the planet's atmosphere. This helps offset or mitigate the adverse effects of climate change and global warming.
When carbon dioxide is absorbed by the oceans, the CO2 dissolves in the seawater and carbonic acid is formed. Carbon emissions have lowered the pH of of the oceans by approximately 10% since the advent of the industrial revolution. Ocean acidification decreases the ability of marine organisms such as phytoplankton and algae to function. Ocean acidification has also been linked to the dying off of coral reefs, as well as negatively impacting fish populations.
What Are Greenhouse Gases?
Many chemical compounds found in the Earth’s
atmosphere act as “greenhouse gases.” These gases allow sunlight to enter
the atmosphere freely. When sunlight strikes the Earth’s surface, some of it
is reflected back towards space as infrared radiation (heat). Greenhouse gases
absorb this infrared radiation and trap the heat in the atmosphere. Over time,
the amount of energy sent from the sun to the Earth’s surface should be
about the same as the amount of energy radiated back into space, leaving the
temperature of the Earth’s surface roughly constant.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Biochar Technologies - new company that is integrating Renewable Energy Technologies with Biochar Production that will provide Carbon Capture and Sequestration. Company will focus on the generation of Synthesis Gas from Biomass Gasification plants that are co-located with their "Natural Wastewater Treatment" plants and the Synthesis Gas will fuel their cogeneration and trigeneration power plants.
______________________________________________________________________________________
What is Biochar?
Biochar is through a process called plasma pyrolysis or plasma gasification which are renewable energy technologies that heat biomass under high temperatures in the absence of oxygen.
When carbon dioxide emissions have been sequestered in biochar, the biochar prevents the release of the carbon dioxide emissions back into the climate, thus becoming a valuable tool in fighting climate change. The carbon dioxide emissions are retained in the biochar for 100 to 10,000 yrs, with 5,000 being a common estimate..
Biochar
is also a valuable soil amendment. Like a fertilizer, plants and food
crops grown with biochar thrive and produce more food than food crops grown
without the addition of biochar. In addition to creating a
valuable soil enhancer, sustainable biochar practices produces synthesis
gas which is a fuel used like natural gas, making it a valuable resource
for renewable energy. When biochar is used as a soil amendment, and buried in the ground,
we are not only removing and sequestering carbon
dioxide emissions, we are "recycling
carbon."
Biochar and the use of the synthesis gas
generated in the production of Biochar, helps fight global climate change by
replacing the fossil fuels that would have generated new "net" carbon
dioxide emissions into the atmosphere.
It has been estimated that through the use of Biochar
Technologies, we can store approximately 2.2 gigatons of carbon
dioxide emissions each year by 2050.
______________________________________________________________________________________
What are Carbon Dioxide Emissions?
According
to the EPA, Carbon Dioxide Emissions,
or "Carbon Emissions"
or simply "CO2," are generated in a number of ways. Carbon
Dioxide Emissions are produced naturally through the carbon cycle and
through human activities like the burning of fossil fuels.
Natural sources of CO2 occur within the carbon cycle where billions of tons of
atmospheric CO2 are removed from the atmosphere by oceans and growing plants,
also known as ‘sinks,’ and are emitted back into the atmosphere annually
through natural processes also known as ‘sources.’ When in balance, the
total carbon dioxide emissions and removals from the entire carbon cycle are
roughly equal.
Since the Industrial Revolution in the 1700’s, human activities, such as the
burning of oil, coal and gas, and deforestation, have increased CO2
concentrations in the atmosphere. In 2005, global atmospheric
concentrations of CO2 were 35% higher than they were before the Industrial Revolution.
Carbon Dioxide Emissions are responsible for about 80% of the problems related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Carbon Dioxide Emissions and carbon dioxide are one of the six chemicals
methane and Biomethane
nitrous oxide
hydrofluorocarbons
perfluorocarbons
sulfur hexafluoride
and all six chemicals are planned to be significantly reduced via the global agreements under the Kyoto Protocol and new legislation in the U.S. under the pending "Cap and Trade" regulations in an effort to prevent climate change.
The
Kyoto Protocol
expires in 2012. Consensus is growing for a replacement for the Kyoto Protocol
which may be conclude in
Johannesburg, South Africa in 2011. If the meeting is successful in 2011,
the "Johannesburg Protocol"
will succeed the Kyoto Protocol. An
interim "Cape Town Accord"
may serve as an interim agreement until the next, more permanent Protocol is
reached. For more
information, see:
What
are Chlorofluorocarbons?
Chlorfluorocarbons are a family of non-reactive, nonflamable gases and volatile liquids.
Halocarbons:
Fluorine, chlorine and bromine belong to a chemical family called the
halogens. When attached to carbon they form a group of compounds called
'halocarbons". The smaller halocarbons turn into a gas quite easily and
are the prime-suspects in ozone-depletion.
Chlorfluorocarbons abreviated CFC, are the major category of man-made halocarbons. Each different CFC is identified by a numbering system which describes the CFC structure.
In the hundreds place, the number represents the number of carbons, less one.
In the tens place the number represents the number of hydrogens, plus one.
In the ones place the number represents the number of fluorines.
For example CFC-113 has two carbons, no hydrogens and three fluorines. CFC-12 has one carbon, no hydrogen and two fluorines.
The non-reactivity of CFC's, so desirable to industry, allows them to drift for years in the environment until they eventually reach the stratosphere. High in the stratosphere, intense UV solar radiation severs chlorines off of the CFC's, and it is these unattached chlorines that are able to catalytically convert ozone molecules into oxygen molecules.
Different CFC's require different amounts of time to remove from the stratosphere, times ranging from 50 to over 200 years; so while it is cheering to see that the growth-rate of Chlorfluorocarbons in the atmosphere is starting to drop (Elkins et.al._Nature_364:1993), the impact of Chlorfluorocarbons on stratospheric ozone will continue well into the 22nd century.
CFC's differ widely in their stabilities and in how effectively they breakup ozone. A rating system called an Ozone Depletition Potential , ODP, is used to compare compounds by how much damage they may cause to environmental ozone. The ODP is arrived at by dividing the cumulative Ozone depletion of the compound by the ozone depletion caused by the release of an equal amount of CFC-12, one of the earliest CFC's. For example methyl chloride, the major naturally-made source of stratospheric chlorine, has a ODP of less than 0.10. This means that if equal amounts of methyl chloride and CFC-12 were releaced into the stratosphere, the methyl chloride would degrade 1/10th as much ozone as the CFC-12 . Halon 1301, a compound that contains bromine as well as chlorine, has an ODP of 10 so it is 10 times more destructive than CFC-12.
As government pressure to ban Chlorfluorocarbons increases, chemical companies are scrambling to find replacements that are effective, nontoxic and have a low ODP. Industry is currently proposing to substitute HCFC's (Hydro-chloro-fluorcarbons) for CFC's because they are nearly as effective and nontoxic as CFC's but with ODP's that are 1/10th to 1/50th that of CFC-11. A big reason for their lower ODP is that it is predicted, based on lab experiments, that HCFC's will break-up in the troposphere and therefore not be able to transport chlorine into the stratosphere. Industry acknowledges that HCFC's are merely stopgap measures in the ongoing search for replacement, but many environmental groups are concerned that HCFC's may relieve pressure on industry to fund research for long-term replacements.
The size of the square reflects the relative contribution of each compound to CFC caused ozone depletion (UNEPdata, 1990). The times are the lefetimes of the compound in the atmosphere before it is broken down and/or removed.

How Can We Decrease
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions?
Greenhouse
gas emissions can
be reduced by switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy technologies, such as solar
energy systems, and upgrading brown buildings to Net Zero Energy
Buildings.
Why Are Atmospheric
Levels of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Increasing?
Levels of several important greenhouse
gases have increased by about 25 percent since large-scale industrialization
began around 150 years ago (Figure 1). During the past 20 years, about
three-quarters of human-made carbon
dioxide emissions were from burning fossil fuels.
Figure 1. Trends in Atmospheric
Concentrations and Anthropogenic Emissions of Carbon Dioxide

Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
are naturally regulated by numerous processes collectively known as the “carbon
cycle” (Figure 2). The movement (“flux”) of carbon between the
atmosphere and the land and oceans is dominated by natural processes, such as
plant photosynthesis. While these natural processes can absorb some of the net
6.1 billion metric tons of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions produced
each year (measured in carbon equivalent terms), an estimated 3.2 billion
metric tons is added to the atmosphere annually. The Earth’s positive
imbalance between emissions and absorption results in the continuing growth in
greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Figure 2.
Global Carbon Cycle (Billion Metric Tons Carbon)

What Effect Do Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Have on Climate Change?
Given
the natural variability of the Earth’s climate, it is difficult to determine
the extent of change that humans cause. In computer-based models, rising
concentrations of greenhouse gases generally produce an increase in the
average temperature of the Earth. Rising temperatures may, in turn, produce
changes in weather, sea levels, and land use patterns, commonly referred to as
“climate change.”
Assessments
generally suggest that the Earth’s climate has warmed over the past century
and that human activity affecting the atmosphere is likely an important
driving factor. A National Research Council study dated May 2001 stated, “Greenhouse
gases are accumulating in Earth’s atmosphere as a result of human
activities, causing surface air temperatures and sub-surface ocean
temperatures to rise. Temperatures are, in fact, rising. The changes observed
over the last several decades are likely mostly due to human activities, but
we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes is also a
reflection of natural variability.”
However, there is uncertainty in how the
climate system varies naturally and reacts to emissions of greenhouse gases.
Making progress in reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate
will require better awareness and understanding of the buildup of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere and the behavior of the climate system.
What Are the Sources of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions?
In the U.S., our greenhouse gas emissions
come mostly from energy use. These are driven largely by economic growth, fuel
used for electricity generation, and weather patterns affecting heating and
cooling needs. Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, resulting from
petroleum and natural gas, represent 82 percent of total U.S. human-made
greenhouse gas emissions (Figure 3). The connection between energy use and
carbon dioxide emissions is explored in the box on the reverse side (Figure
4).
Figure 3. U.S. Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
by Gas, 2001
(Million Metric Tons of Carbon Equivalent)

Figure 4.
U.S. Primary Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2001

Another greenhouse gas, Biomethane,
comes from landfills, coal mines, oil and gas operations, and agriculture; it
represents 9 percent of total emissions. Nitrogen
oxides (5 percent of total emissions), meanwhile, is emitted from burning
fossil fuels and through the use of certain fertilizers and industrial
processes. Human-made gases (2 percent of total emissions) are released as
byproducts of industrial processes and through leakage.
What Is the Prospect for Future Carbon
Dioxide Emissions?
World carbon
dioxide emissions are expected to increase by 1.9 percent annually
between 2001 and 2025 (Figure 5). Much of the increase in these emissions is
expected to occur in the developing world where emerging economies, such as
China and India, fuel economic development with fossil energy. Developing
countries’ emissions are expected to grow above the world average at 2.7
percent annually between 2001 and 2025; and surpass emissions of
industrialized countries near 2018.
Figure 5. World Carbon
Dioxide Emissions by Region, 2001-2025
(Million
Metric Tons of Carbon Equivalent)

The U.S. produces about 25 percent of
global carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels; primarily because
our economy is the largest in the world and we meet 85 percent of our energy
needs through burning fossil fuels. The U.S. is projected to lower its carbon
intensity by 25 percent from 2001 to 2025, and remain below the world average
(Figure 6).

Figure
6. Carbon Intensity by Region, 2001-2025
(Metric Tons of Carbon Equivalent per Million $1997)
Energy Production and Carbon
Dioxide Emissions
For over one hundred years, energy and power
production have been generated around the world through the burning of fossil
fuels, including; fuel oil, coal, diesel, and natural gas. Over
the past decade, environmental science and research has discovered and linked
global warming, and global climate change to the carbon
dioxide emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels. This has
placed an increased need to reduce energy consumption and discover more
environmentally friendly fuel sources.
Carbon Dioxide Emissions
World Carbon Dioxide Emissions since 1750 (cubic feet)
__________________________________________________________
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Linked to Photo courtesy of Alaska Image Library. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service
Since the year 1750
##
World CO2 since 1750 (cubic feet)
Since 1750, humans have emitted over 5 trillion pounds of carbon dioxide into
the atmosphere. Roughly half of this has ended up in the oceans where it is
beginning to damage the coral reefs. The other half is still in the atmosphere
and causing global warming. Each pound of CO2 takes up as much space as a 500
pound person.
The formula (which should be good for a year or two) is:
C(t) = 2.58 ×1012 + 1240×t, where t is seconds since the start of 2007.
C is tonnes (metric tons) of carbon dioxide emissions.
2205 x C gives pounds of carbon dioxide emissions.
That comes to over 43 billion tons/year or over 86 trillion pounds/year.
Carbon dioxide (2) = 1 carbon atom with 2 oxygen atoms.
Carbon has relative weight 12 and Oxygen 16.
So it takes only 12 pounds of carbon to make 12+16+16 = 44 pounds of CO2.
the Loss of Polar Bears

__________________________________________________________
“spending
hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars every year for oil,
much of it from the Middle East, is just about the single stupidest thing that
modern society could possibly do. It’s very difficult to think of anything
more idiotic then that.”
- R. James Woolsey, Jr., former
Director of the CIA
______________________________________________________
We support the Renewable Energy Institute by donating a portion of our profits to the Renewable Energy Institute in their efforts to reduce fossil fuel use through renewable energy and their goals to end fossil fuel pollution by reducing/eliminating Carbon Emissions, Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
The Renewable Energy Institute is "Changing The Way The World Makes and Uses Energy by Providing Research & Development, Funding and Resources That Creates Sustainable Energy via 'Carbon Free Energy,' 'Clean Power Generation' and 'Pollution Free Power' Through Expanding the use of Renewable Energy Technologies."

![]()
![]()
The information contained on this site is
copyright protected and
cannot be
reproduced in any form or manner without our consent.
Dangerous
Climate Change
www.DangerousClimateChange.com
![]()
info@DangerousClimateChange.com
Renewable Energy Institute
Copyright
© 2007
All Rights Reserved